This is NOT art.
Jun. 9th, 2010 11:42 amI look at DeviantART daily, to check my messages and see what new art was been posted. I've noticed this pattern for a while, but today it really stood out.
There were 12 pictures of female nudity on the front page. Twelve. And some of them were frankly grotesque.
Like, "lets see how ginormous I can digitally make this girl's tits compared to her frame", or "Lets tie strings around a girl's groin to mimic a rape kit and then take a close up shot of her hoohaa".
I have nothing against nudity, as you all know from some of my own art, and appreciate an artistic nude photo (in fact nude photography was a big part of how I learned to draw the human figure). But most of these are in no way artistic. Yes, art is subjective blah blah. But these. Are just ugly. Gratuitous. Porn. There is little to no skill on the photographer's part, and little artistry in the setting/pose/etc. Playboy is more artistic than some of this shit.
And if you try to report it? Because some of them aren't just distasteful, they're downright gross and offensive.... Well if you report it DA will tell you they did nothing to violate the terms of use because in order to be considered pornography they have to be touching their genitals or inserting something into it. Seriously. And believe me, these "photographers" know how to push the boundary and get away with it.
Meanwhile, many fanartists (including myself) have their work repeatedly deleted by mods who have flat out called us pedophiles who try to hide their perversions by slapping boobs on 12yr old girls and claiming their over 18. That's almost a direct quote. Even if your character, Sakura for example, is an obvious adult in the picture, you're still a sick pedo. The DA terms even state that a character will always be considered their orignal age, regardless of "aging up" or even canon timeskips. Like Kagome being 18 and marrying Inuyasha at the end of the series? Never happened. And by the way, most of the fanart that gets deleted for violations are not nude or sexual in nature. They are pictures of kissing and cuddling.
See a problem here?
I'm tired of the double standard and blatant discrimination against fanartists. I'm sick of the algorithm that determines what goes on the front page (If you didn't know, they pick the most popular deviations in each category, so something from Artisan Crafts might be there even if it only had 50 views because it was the top in its own category.) Which means the truly popular art might be on page 8 or 15. They do this because if they didn't, the first several pages would be dominated by fanart, because that's what most people are there for. DA hates this - they want to be a pretentious site for true artists.
I'm also sick of their search protocol, which posts results by title and not by subject. Even though they allow you to tag your deviations. I'll give a good example (and this isnt bragging, it's just a fact): My DeiSaku art is some of the most popular on the site. Yet if you do a search for "DeiSaku" what will come up is all the pics with DeiSaku in the title. These are not the best of Deisaku, because the artists of the better stuff generally bother to give their work a proper title. After wading through roughly 10 pages of doodles and such with 10-100 favorites, you will finally see my most faved (1125 and counting) DeiSaku pic "Stay". How is this system accurate? When you search for most popular all time, you should get most popular all time.
Anyway, this has turned into a really long rant starting with what crap passes for art, and ending up at how I despise DA in general. From this, to getting my art stolen constantly (and then told it violated policy anyway when I reported it), I've had it with that fucking site. I don't have the time, energy, or skill to make my own fansite, but I think I'm going to stop paying those assholes money for a premium account.
There were 12 pictures of female nudity on the front page. Twelve. And some of them were frankly grotesque.
Like, "lets see how ginormous I can digitally make this girl's tits compared to her frame", or "Lets tie strings around a girl's groin to mimic a rape kit and then take a close up shot of her hoohaa".
I have nothing against nudity, as you all know from some of my own art, and appreciate an artistic nude photo (in fact nude photography was a big part of how I learned to draw the human figure). But most of these are in no way artistic. Yes, art is subjective blah blah. But these. Are just ugly. Gratuitous. Porn. There is little to no skill on the photographer's part, and little artistry in the setting/pose/etc. Playboy is more artistic than some of this shit.
And if you try to report it? Because some of them aren't just distasteful, they're downright gross and offensive.... Well if you report it DA will tell you they did nothing to violate the terms of use because in order to be considered pornography they have to be touching their genitals or inserting something into it. Seriously. And believe me, these "photographers" know how to push the boundary and get away with it.
Meanwhile, many fanartists (including myself) have their work repeatedly deleted by mods who have flat out called us pedophiles who try to hide their perversions by slapping boobs on 12yr old girls and claiming their over 18. That's almost a direct quote. Even if your character, Sakura for example, is an obvious adult in the picture, you're still a sick pedo. The DA terms even state that a character will always be considered their orignal age, regardless of "aging up" or even canon timeskips. Like Kagome being 18 and marrying Inuyasha at the end of the series? Never happened. And by the way, most of the fanart that gets deleted for violations are not nude or sexual in nature. They are pictures of kissing and cuddling.
See a problem here?
I'm tired of the double standard and blatant discrimination against fanartists. I'm sick of the algorithm that determines what goes on the front page (If you didn't know, they pick the most popular deviations in each category, so something from Artisan Crafts might be there even if it only had 50 views because it was the top in its own category.) Which means the truly popular art might be on page 8 or 15. They do this because if they didn't, the first several pages would be dominated by fanart, because that's what most people are there for. DA hates this - they want to be a pretentious site for true artists.
I'm also sick of their search protocol, which posts results by title and not by subject. Even though they allow you to tag your deviations. I'll give a good example (and this isnt bragging, it's just a fact): My DeiSaku art is some of the most popular on the site. Yet if you do a search for "DeiSaku" what will come up is all the pics with DeiSaku in the title. These are not the best of Deisaku, because the artists of the better stuff generally bother to give their work a proper title. After wading through roughly 10 pages of doodles and such with 10-100 favorites, you will finally see my most faved (1125 and counting) DeiSaku pic "Stay". How is this system accurate? When you search for most popular all time, you should get most popular all time.
Anyway, this has turned into a really long rant starting with what crap passes for art, and ending up at how I despise DA in general. From this, to getting my art stolen constantly (and then told it violated policy anyway when I reported it), I've had it with that fucking site. I don't have the time, energy, or skill to make my own fansite, but I think I'm going to stop paying those assholes money for a premium account.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-09 07:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-09 07:59 pm (UTC)I wish I could set up a site like Lily's
no subject
Date: 2010-06-09 08:03 pm (UTC)However, now that you mention it, have you ever tried mangabullet? My sister made an account there once. It's not as active of course but it seems pretty good-- the focus is on manga-type drawings, so I don't think you'd find any of the "photography" there.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 01:30 pm (UTC)piratedownload DreamWeaver and have it do the work for you. ;)Have you ever had a website before? Do you know anything about FTPs? Honestly, the hardest thing you'll come across is actually getting the domain name. But someone you know may have a domain already and can give you a subdomain. (For example, a friend of mine owns ivygardens.net. She lets me share in this, and my subdomain is fallacy.ivygardens.net.)
no subject
Date: 2010-06-11 01:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-09 07:26 pm (UTC)The "what's are and what's not" argument is an old one, but even still ... you can only push that eye of the beholder excuse so far.
And yeah, hi? Newsflash, DA: you are a fucking website, not a NYC art gallery. Get over yourselves.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-09 07:58 pm (UTC)I know right. And some of the most talented artists Ive seen on that site are fanartists, or at least have a couple fanarts in their gallery.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-09 09:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 01:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 01:31 pm (UTC)Truer words have never been spoken!
no subject
Date: 2010-06-09 08:05 pm (UTC)And, I feel your pain, dude. DA is bull, but I have yet to find another art site that can compete. And the search thing really annoys me too. Mhjdfaolfj
And the age in fanart, is utter crap too. So much fanart is based on animes/manga that have a supernatural twist to them. In Angel Sanctuary, someone could pair Alexial with Kira, which according to DA would be pedophelia because Kira is like 17 (despite being Lucifer reincarnated) and Alexial is hundreds of years old (despite her soul being reincarnated, her body still exists and is used later). D:< And what about Bleach? Some of those captains and "new characters" are actually OLDER THAN HELL. UGH.
I think you should see if you can find a website (free or pay for it) and just design that and post your art there and then you don't have to worry about violating anyone's policies :D
no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 01:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-09 09:03 pm (UTC)Popular is also a ratio algorithm. It takes into account the number of faves in relation to the total number of hits. Really popular pictures tend to have a lower fave/hit ratio than others.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 01:50 am (UTC)From what I've seen, most popular fanartists have between a 3-1 to 5-1 views-to-faves ratio. But I've also seen stuff on the front page that's only there because it was so scandalous that it got 3k views in an hour, but few faves. Like stolen art for example, or usually blatant porn.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-09 10:00 pm (UTC)I'm a very casual user of DA and I mostly post photos that I have taken so I don't really know the rules. But thanks for opening my eyes to the double standards that they have.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 01:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 02:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 01:52 am (UTC)There is a picture on dA that has been reported about 55 times for being pornographic - its not photography, its a digital painting - and it is blatanly pornographic and disturbing on many levels. Yet every time people report it, the dA admins say "no its not" and close the report.
http://janaschi.deviantart.com/art/Raupture-for-Alex-145195642
They have removed the report art as stolen part in their report deviations. If you find someone's art has been stolen, you have to note the original artist and the artist has to submit a legal document demanding that dA take down the offending art or the original artist can sue.
I'm about ready to just move to another site. There is a place called art9 - you might wanna check it out. Its like dA with out all the crap.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 02:00 am (UTC)I dealt with a theft recently and you don't have to submit legal proof, just a copy of your original like always. But it does suck that other people cant report stolen. Some of the stolen art comes from asian fansites and the artist has no idea because they don't use DA, nor do they speak english.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 02:21 am (UTC)Any way... maybe check out art9 - it looks pretty good. I'm not too into the layout and color schemes, but its pretty simple all the same.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 12:13 pm (UTC)And to cynchick, the only reason I joined DA was so I could follow your work, and I normally only browse so I never new about the search keywords, etc. It is ridiculous. >.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-11 01:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 01:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 03:21 am (UTC)i had the same experience tryng to report disturbing, blatant, disgusting porn spamming the front page, only to be told it was "art", not a violation. and they were constantly gaming the algorithms to shuffle away talented fanartists. i finally told them they were welcome to cater to the truckstop men's room crowd, i would be taking my business and my crits elsewhere. i did too.
a lot of real talent has graduated from that trashy site, leaving the underage, the uniformed, and a few gems who have made it work against all odds, like you, 'zemotion, PET, karadin, you know, all the really famous ppls.
but yeah we need a new site -- it's them and their right hand tonight, just how they like it.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-11 01:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 01:37 pm (UTC)Anyway, I might've mentioned this before, but for your explicit stuff, you could just censor it and think link offsite (like to hentai-foundry), which is what I do. It's worked out pretty well so far. I haven't had any of the censored stuff deleted. Then again, my dA popularity in no way rivals yours, so. :S
no subject
Date: 2010-06-11 01:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-11 04:20 am (UTC)I tried to submit a couple things to hentai-foundry, and they sent me this email:
Your picture #73169 ("mmf") was rejected by SH-44154.c4b3c
The given reason(s) are: Please utilize the ''Scraps'' feature when posting sketches/WIPs.
The quality of the lines and colors in this pic are not suited for the gallery
Motherfucker, I will tell you if the lines and colors in MY picture are suitable for MY gallery. If I don't think it's a fucking scrap, it's not a scrap.
Damn, I can't remember the last time I raged this hard.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-11 05:57 am (UTC)i mean.
ITS A FUCKING HENTAI SITE FOR FUCKS SAKE.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-11 02:02 am (UTC)So be careful.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-11 02:13 am (UTC)If I get banned, que sera sera. That'll be a pretty good indication to move on.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-11 03:29 am (UTC)But then again, its not the end of the world for folks like us who really dont care, lol
no subject
Date: 2010-06-11 04:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-13 03:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-18 10:56 am (UTC)